data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1374/f13749f3e29175c60a7e6b93154befa28f2f8dd0" alt=""
Every year, I try to write some spiffy Advent devotions for the Christmas season. I may not hit all 7 days all 4 weeks, but at least one a week- AND there are plenty here from past years going back to 2004. Read some of my Advent devotions.
Buy Nothing Day is an informal day of protest against consumerism observed by social activists. Typically celebrated the Friday after American Thanksgiving in North America and the following day internationally, in 2008 the dates will be November 28 and 29 respectively.[1] It was founded by Vancouver artist Ted Dave and subsequently promoted by the Canadian Adbusters magazine.
The first Buy Nothing Day was organized in Vancouver in September of 1992 "as a day for society to examine the issue of over-consumption."[2] In 1997, it was moved to the Friday after American Thanksgiving, which is one of the top 10 busiest shopping days in the United States. Outside of North America, Buy Nothing Day is celebrated on the following Saturday. Despite controversies, Adbusters managed to advertise Buy Nothing Day on CNN, but many other major television networks declined to air their ads.[3] Soon, campaigns started appearing in United States, the United Kingdom, Israel, Germany, New Zealand, Japan, the Netherlands, and Norway. Participation now includes more than 65 nations.[2]
While critics of the day charge that Buy Nothing Day simply causes participants to buy the next day,[4] Adbusters states that it "isn't just about changing your habits for one day" but "about starting a lasting lifestyle commitment to consuming less and producing less waste."[2] An example of an event celebrating Buy Nothing Day is a Buy Nothing Day hike.[5]
"For the record: Liberals love America. In fact, what makes us liberals is that we actually read and believed all those pretty words in the Declaration of Independence about "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness," and in the Bill of Rights about freedom of speech, religion, assembly, privacy, and all the rest of it.We're idealists that way. We want to live in the country the Founders described. We believe that the nation's founding documents expressed a uniquely powerful moral contract between the people and their government, and an audaciously positive vision of people's ability and competence to shape their own future. When we get annoying and whiny, it's usually because we believe so much in America's astonishing promise—and our own responsibility for realizing it—that we're sorely disappointed when the country falls short of that standard. We really want to believe we can do better.
Conservatism, by contrast, tends to take a dim view of human nature, prefers hierarchy to liberty, and isn't completely convinced people can or should be trying to contravene the will of God or their betters by trying to arrange their own futures. This tends to lead to a selective reading of the Constitution (as well as the Bible), and—as we've seen in the Bush years—a far more flexible attitude toward its interpretation..."
"It's going to be a stranger season than most, in no small part because the changing political winds are going to put some fresh twists and turns into the same old holiday discussions. But holiday arguments over religion and politics are a tradition that's as old as the republic. For most of us, wouldn't be an American family holiday without a little hot conversation served up over a freshly roasted bird."
Oddly enough, while some of my Republican relatives are still leery of Obama, they seem pretty unanimous in the view that Bush has been a colossal nimrod. But these 10 myths are certainly alive and well in Western Iowa where I live. Myth #11 is that we hate Western Iowa because it's so staunchly Republican- and I love it here so much, I can't imagine living anywhere else. It's one of the things I'm most thankful for today. What's hard about it is that most of the right wingers who live here honestly swallow these 10 myths hook, line and sinker!
Maybe I'd still have a weekly column in the local paper if fewer people weren't so painfully prejudiced against us "Lefties."
If you're a lifelong, dyed in the wool Republican, please give this article a read and maybe you won't be so offended by me all the time.
Moderates, Independents and Democrats- (Blue Dog and Yellow) read this, print off a copy, study it and do your best to educate and enlighten our friends and family in the "Red" parallel universe, perhaps someday we can heal the tensions that have been straining America so severely for the last decade and a half or so.
Read the whole article at http://www.ourfuture.org/blog-entry/2008114825/talking-turkey-ten-myths-conservative-believe-about-progressives
Fast-moving Sayre fire forces Sylmar residents from homes
- Los Angeles Times 8:54am
Source: www.latimes.com
An explosive brush fire driven by 60-mile-per-hour gusts ripped through the northern San Fernando Valley today, burning homes before leaping both the 210 and 5 Freeways...
More than 2,500 acres had burned by 5 a.m. Saturday morning, with more than 1,000 structures threatened by uncontrolled flames and more than 10,000 residents were under mandatory evacuation.
Toby Keith Praises Obama, Says He's A Democrat
RYAN PEARSON | August 19, 2008Barack Obama is getting praise from Nashville, courtesy of one big, patriotic country star.
Toby Keith, perhaps best known to non-country audiences for his post-Sept. 11 song "Courtesy of the Red, White and Blue," says he's a Democrat, and was impressed by the senator from Illinois.
Keith has said in the past that the 2002 song _ which included lines aimed at the Taliban like "we lit up your world like the Fourth of July" _ was more patriotic than pro-war.
Asked while promoting his new movie "Beer For My Horses" about the role of patriotism in the current presidential election, Keith replied: "There's a big part of America that really believes that there is a war on terrorism, and that we need to finish up.
"So I thought it was beautiful the other day when Obama went to Afghanistan and got educated about Afghanistan and Iraq. He came back and said some really nice things.
"So as far as leadership and patriotism goes, I think it's really important that those things have to take place. And I think he's the best Democratic candidate we've had since Bill Clinton. And that's coming from a Democrat."
By Cal Thomas
Thirty years of trying to use government to stop abortion, preserve opposite-sex marriage, improve television and movie content and transform culture into the conservative Evangelical image has failed. The question now becomes: should conservative Christians redouble their efforts, contributing more millions to radio and TV preachers and activists, or would they be wise to try something else?
...Scripture teaches that God’s power (if that is what conservative Evangelicals want and not their puny attempts at grabbing earthly power) is made perfect in weakness. He speaks of the tiny mustard seed, the seemingly worthless widow’s mite, of taking the last place at the table and the humbling of one’s self, the washing of feet and similar acts and attitudes; the still, small voice. How did conservative Evangelicals miss this and instead settle for a lesser power, which in reality is no power at all? When did they settle for an inferior “kingdom”?
Evangelicals are at a junction. They can take the path that will lead them to more futility and ineffective attempts to reform culture through government, or they can embrace the far more powerful methods outlined by the One they claim to follow. By following His example, they will decrease, but He will increase. They will get no credit, but they will see results. If conservative Evangelicals choose obscurity and seek to glorify God, they will get much of what they hope for, but can never achieve, in and through politics.
What are you going to blog about now Ted? Will your column come back now that you have won? Or are you still saddened over Sueferts letter?
10:15 AM
I'm saddened whenever anyone tries to marginalize or impugn me because I share opinions which I have thought out carefully and hold because I care deeply about our country.
I didn't stop writing a column for the press because of JoAnn Suefert's tirade of a letter to the editor. I stopped because the whole climate and culture of the community where I live has been too polarized and too emotionally charged, and for the sake of my family and loved ones I felt that it would be better 1) not to contribute to that polarization and 2) not subject those close to me to the same resentment, indignation and ridicule which I became a target of because of my opinions.
What will I blog about now? What does any blogger blog about?
I wish I could stop writing the way that an alcoholic wishes they could stop drinking.
My column was never exclusively about John McCain, or even exclusively about politics. I'm sure life will present things that I'll find funny, things that I'll compulsively feel the need to analyze or draw attention to- and plenty of public figures and politicians that I'll want to scrutinize (including Steve King and Jason Schultz, but probably plenty of Democrats too- maybe even Barack Obama eventually).
I still don't know if I'll write a column in the PRESS again or if this blog will be the only yard I get to play in, but I've tried to stop writing altogether and it's bigger than I am.
Whoever you are, thank you for your comment, and thank you for reading- whether we ever agree on anything or not. I hope you get something out of it.
12:11 PM