Showing posts with label Oil. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Oil. Show all posts

Thursday, August 21, 2008

Opposition to Ethanol a bunch of manure

Food costs are up and some people seem to want to blame corn farmers. The blame is probably coming from the petroleum lobby, because people who know a lot more about corn and markets than me can tell you that if anything, there is a surplus of corn. If the price of corn isn’t high because of unnatural market manipulation or speculation, than it’s high because the price of diesel and gas that corn growers need for tractors and trucking.

One of the things that the oil companies don’t want us to understand. Corn ethanol/alcohol is made from the starch and sugar in corn. Cows are biologically and anatomically incapable of digesting those corns and sugars. A Cow’s 4-part stomach is specifically designed to design fiber or cellulose.

The starch and sugar goes in one end and out the other. Crap! What a waste of potential energy!

I am less worried about Iowa farmers sending too much corn to ethanol plants than I am about Brazilian farmers plowing under the Amazon rainforest to plant corn that competes with Americans for market share. Less rainforest means less oxygen producing trees and more carbon dioxide, less ozone, more climate change etc. etc. etc. Not to mention less money for Iowa farmers, and more Brazilians driving more cars etc. etc.

But if we’re still worried about sending too much corn to ethanol instead of food products, animal feeds, and the myriad of other industrial uses, there’s always switch grass.

According to the Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee, switch grass “grows fast, capturing lots of solar energy and turning it into lots of chemical energy— cellulose—that can be liquefied, gasified, or burned directly. It also reaches deep into the soil for water, and uses the water it finds very efficiently.” They say it is one of the best crops for protecting the soil and preventing erosion AND, it filters more carbon dioxide out of the air than most crops.

But corn and switch grass are not the only plants that could be used as oil alternatives. Cattails, that’s right, cattails, also known as bullrush or reedmace has all kinds of environmentally friendly uses. Many cities use cattails to process their sewage. Cattails filter out nitrates not only from human waste, but from fertilizer run off. I think that cattails might be a great landscaping idea for big hog operations.

They’re also incredibly valuable as wild life habitat. Hunters have to love that. Cattails are a high starch plant, so once they’ve done their job cleaning the water, they can be harvested and processed into ethanol just like corn and switch grass. What makes it even better is that it’s a perennial, so farmers wouldn’t have to keep buying seed and replanting it every year.

One of the problems that waste water and runoff is causing is something you may have heard about in the news called “dead zones.” Dead zones are large areas of ocean where plants and fish and other life forms can no longer survive, either from pollution to that area, or from rising average water temperatures. A great solution could be kelp. Kelp is an amazing plant, basically a type of algae that can grow several stories tall under sea.

Like cattails, kelp cleans the water it’s in. Like the rainforest, kelp uses tons of carbon dioxide while producing tons of oxygen. Like corn, switch grass, and cattails, kelp provides incredible habitat for animals, which commercial fishermen would benefit from. Deliberately planted or farmed kelp can bring life back to dead zones. And what very few people realize is that, like corn, switch grass, and cattails, kelp can be made into ethanol.

Republicans are demanding that Congress open more coastlines to off shore oil exploration, but the oil companies already lease 90 million acres to do that and they are not doing it on 70 million of those acres. Why should they be allowed to risk more ecological damage when they refuse to drill where they are?

Could it be because it’s in their best interest to keep supplies low so that prices remain high, insuring their continued record profits? Who would want to scare us into believing that inflation of food prices is the corn farmers fault? People who want us to remain dependant on oil.

Especially when new drilling would only reduce the price of gas by a couple of cents a gallon and not for a decade or more anyway, more off shore drilling is not the answer. Turning to environmentally friendly fuel alternatives including ethanol, geo-thermal, solar and wind would not only be better stewardship of the environment, it would create millions of jobs- just like the New Deal, WWI, the railroads, or the internet all did. That would mean that green fuels would benefit the whole economy for at least twenty to forty years. Most importantly it would reduce our reliance on foreign oil, making Iran, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Russia and Venezuela far less important. Best of all, it would benefit Iowa agriculture if we’re smart enough to pursue it aggressively.

Even if you think that global warming and climate change are nothing more than Chicken Little panicking about the sky caving in, “green energy” like corn ethanol is still a great idea.


Friday, May 09, 2008

Democracy is Dead

The year that most of this year’s high school graduates were born, dictator Saddam Hussein accused Emir Al-Ahmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah the third of stealing Iraq’s oil by drilling sideways. So he invaded Kuwait, which was the fourth richest country in the world per capita.

The U.S. President, a man named George Bush thought we should go to war to get Iraq out of Kuwait.

Bush had become an oil millionaire through the Zapata and Dresser Corporations in Texas in the 1950’s and 60’s. By the time you were three or four years old, the Dresser Corporation was the third largest oil-services company in the world.

When the class of 2008 were in second grade, a man named Dick Cheney negotiated a $7 billion merger between Dresser and a company called Halliburton. When George Bush went to war against Saddam Hussein in 1991, he was our Secretary of Defense.

When this year’s Seniors were in seventh grade, George Bush’s son, decided that he wanted to go to war against Iraq too. We weren’t sure why because we were already in a war in Afghanistan, trying to catch the man who planned the attack on the World Trade Center, back when they were in fifth grade.

Halliburton and its subsidiaries, including KBR and Blackwater received billions of dollars in no-bid government contracts to help build military bases in Iraq this time around. Coincidently, Dick Cheney was the second President Bush’s Vice President. Weird huh?

Republican, Democrat, Conservative, Neo-Conservative, Progressive, Moderate, Liberal, Independent- I don’t care who you are. It has to bother you that gas was only $1.46/gal in 2000 and it’s $3.59/gal. Especially when this past quarter, Exxon-Mobile reported the highest profits ever recorded by any company in the history of the world.

It takes only seconds for the numbers to fly by as you’re filling your gas tank. Just think, Exxon made $1,287 of profit per second in 2007. How long does it take you to make that kind of money? A week? Good for you, a couple of weeks? A month?

Meanwhile Chevron and Shell made their all time highest profits too.

Doesn’t this all seem at least a tiny little, teensy weensie bit wrong to you?
I think it’s obscene, but what do I know, I’m just one of those slimy, traitorous, bleeding heart, “American-hating” liberals.

Thursday, March 20, 2008

Markets low, oil high?

"...the rulers of the exchange of mankind's goods have failed through their own stubbornness and their own incompetence, have admitted their failures and abdicated. Practices of the unscrupulous money changers stand indicted in the court of public opinion, rejected by the hearts and minds of men.

True, they have tried, but their efforts have been cast in the pattern of an outworn tradition. Faced by failure of credit, they have proposed only the lending of more money.

Stripped of the lure of profit by which to induce our people to follow their false leadership, they have resorted to exhortations, pleading tearfully for restored conditions. They know only the rules of a generation of self-seekers.

They have no vision, and when there is no vision the people perish.

The money changers have fled their high seats in the temple of our civilization (see Matthew 21:11-13). We may now restore that temple to the ancient truths.

The measure of the restoration lies in the extent to which we apply social values more noble than mere monetary profit.

Happiness lies not in the mere possession of money, it lies in the joy of achievement, in the thrill of creative effort.

The joy and moral stimulation of work no longer must be forgotten in the mad chase of evanescent profits. These dark days will be worth all they cost us if they teach us that our true destiny is not to be ministered unto but to minister to ourselves and to our fellow-men.

Recognition of the falsity of material wealth as the standard of success goes hand in hand with the abandonment of the false belief that public office and high political position are to be values only by the standards of pride of place and personal profit, and there must be an end to a conduct in banking and in business which too often has given to a sacred trust the likeness of callous and selfish wrongdoing.

Small wonder that confidence languishes, for it thrives only on honesty, on honor, on the sacredness of obligations, on faithful protection, on unselfish performance. Without them it cannot live."

From FDR's first inagural address, 1933- the speech where he declared we have nothing to fear but fear itself.

Do you ever feel like our leaders have been trying to use fear to manipulate us?

  • Fear of terrorists (trying to link AlQuaeda to Iran, even though Iran is Shi'a and hates Muhabeist Suniis like AlQuaeda)
  • Fear of "the other"- blaming our economic and crime problems on immigrants desperate for a better way of life
  • Fear of what is different, a black man with an Arab middle name, or homosexuals or anyone who believes differently that the most visible and vocal television preachers.

But fear is wrong, even in the most difficult times. "There is no fear in love. But perfect love drives out fear, because fear has to do with punishment. The one who fears is not made perfect in love." 1 John 4:18

Just some things to think about.

Saturday, June 16, 2007

Coyote Canyon

Here is a painting I did back in college (1990-something) I was really into John Nieto ( http://www.johnnieto.com ) back then. He's still one of my favorite Native American artists. In hind-sight, I'm not sure how much I still like it- you know how you're kind of uncomfortable with artwork you did a long time ago. It isn't really cohesive, it's kind of busy and has like 3 or 4 different styles. Still, I love the joyful abandon I had when I did it and I love how Southwestern I was trying to be.

Wednesday, December 13, 2006

Progress on Ellen

Here is some more progress on my daughter's birthday painting...

Stage four- added some yellow glaze to make things look more alive, had to be careful to avoid making her look jaundiced.

Step Five- Added some umber and some pink- her favorite color! I'm a little frustrated that the pink turned out so orange, but it does seem to match. I decided to take some artistic license and trade the morning glories for gerber daisies, or some vague pink daisy looking flower. She's a fun, silly, high energy kid, so why not go with whimsy over realism? But she 's starting to look sort of sad...
Step Six- As she is so bold, I decided to increase the contrast with some black and white and threw in a little purple while I was at it to help tie the pinks and blues together. I'm SO close but I'm not sure what it needs. I know that the right eye needs work, the glint doesn't quite look natural. Several students have been making comments; unfortunatly they're not all positive. One thinks she looks too old. The black and purple do kind of suggest eye liner and shadow. Another thought she's too brown/dark. One thought that the eyes are too big and with the black, they look like Japanese Anime. They are a little too big, but I reasoned that it added to the child-like feel so that's okay.

Here's a larger view. At right is a photo of the painting I did last year for her older sister. It didn't help, I wasn't able to match the styles so I just went in a new dirrection. At left is the photo I used for inspiration. If this was a project by a student, I'd probably give them grief about how the eyes are angled, like in the photo, but the nose and mouth are straight like in a head-on portrait. I had the same problem a couple of years ago on a watercolor that I tried to do of Benjamin Franklin. I just hope that in five or ten year when she's a teen/adult she doesn't hate it and feel embarassed by the goofy painting her dad tried to do of her when she was five.

Scroll down a ways to see how this painting started (steps 1-3) last week.

Click here to see and read about her sister Grace's painting

Thursday, August 17, 2006

The Middle East Untangled


The Middle East Untangled

Page 3 Charter Oak-Ute NEWSpaper & Schleswig Leader- Thursday, August 17, 2006

The most important thing to remember about the Middle East is to remember that it's not any ONE thing. It's LOTS of very different things. Too many supposed "experts" on TV "news" fail to differentiate between all these different and not always directly related, complicated things.
"Muslims" are followers of "Islam" (God's way). They believe that God, ("Allah"- that is "the One worthy to be praised" ) is this "Jehovah" of the original Jews, but that somehow they have gone terribly wrong. They believe that Allah's final and most important prophet was a guy by the name of "Mohammed."


I guess the mountain wouldn't come to him, so he went to it and they believe Allah gave him the last word in scripture, the Koran (sometimes spelled Qur'an).


There are 5 "pillars" believers must adhere to in this faith; 1) belief in only one (not triune) god and that Muhammad is his prophet, 2) daily prayer, 3) concern and giving charity for the poor, 4) self-purification through fasting, and 5) making a pilgrimage to the Kaaba in Mecca if you have the means. This is where they believe that Abraham built an altar with his son Ishmael. Whenever they pray, Muslims face the Kaaba, no matter where they are in the world.


But Islam is by no means uniform. First there's Sunnah ("the Muslim way of life") followed by Sunni Muslims. They have a second book besides the Koran, called the Hadith. In theory, this form of Islam is pacifist and they think of Mohammed and the Koran as absolutely inerrant only when it comes to theology, but not necessarily so for civil and cultural law. This is the biggest denomination in Islam, 80%. They think that Mohammed set up a council of "Imans", or leaders after his death.


Then there's Shi'a, practiced by Shiites, 20% if Muslims. They think that Muhammad's Koran is the absolute inerrant word of Allah on all topics. You might call them "Fundamentalist." They're much more militant. They believed that Mohammed appointed his cousin (who was also his sin-in-law) his sole successor.


But there is also "Ibadi" Islam, an even more conservative sect set up
50 years after Mohammed's death in Oman. And then there's Wahhabism. This is an extremist, fundamentalist sect of Sunnism. "Wahhabi" is a pretty funny sounding name, that's probably why they prefer to call themselves. "Salafist."


"Salaf" means "the earlier generations. They follow the teachings of their founder, Muhammad ibn al Wahhab. They believe that they are the ONLY true practitioners of Islam, not merely a sect. (Sounds like lots of Christians I know.) As you can imagine, they are going to hate Shiites like the Irish Protestants hate Irish Catholics. They are
going to resent mainstream Sunnis the way "born-again" fundamentalists think that main-line Christians are somehow lazy hypocrites.


Osama bin Laden and Alqueda, the perpetrators of the 911 attacks are Wahhabists. Bin Laden may be hiding out in either Afghanistan or Pakistan but he is from Saudi Arabia. They are predominantly Sunni, own lots of oil, have a royal family, NOT a democracy, and they're supposedly our allies. We gave bin Laden and other groups in Afghanistan tons of money and weapons in the 1980's to fight the Soviet Union.


Bin Laden loathed and hated Saddam Hussein, but not as much as America. Saddam Hussein is a non-religious Sunni. His Ba'athist party was nationalistic and fascist. It's ironic because Iraq isn't one nation. It's a bunch of nationalities pieced together first after WWI and then again after WWII. There are Sunnis, Shiahs, Kurds, Turks, a handful of Jews and Christians. All of whom pretty much hate each other. That may be why it's basically disintegrated into chaos. The poor majority of Iraqis were Shiite and had been persecuted by Hussein.


We gave Hussein tons of money and weapons in the '80's to fight Iran and so he'd like us more than the Soviet Union.

Muhamoud Ahmadinejad is the current President of Iran, who hates Iraq (they had a war in the '80's). Iran used to be one of our greatest allies in the Middle East until they had a revolution in 1979. Their Shah, or king, who violated lots of human rights and lived a pretty extravagant lifestyle at his subject's expense. We gave the Shah lots of money and weapons so he'd like us more than the Soviet Union.

You might remember their revolution was led by a the Ayatollah (supreme leader) Ruhollah Musavi Khomeini, who practiced a mystic version of Shi'a called Irfan- sort of like what Salafism is to Sunnism.


As you may have heard, Ahmadinejad wants nuclear power- we think he want's the bomb. (Pakistan and Israel both have the bomb. Pakistan and India hate each other, Iran pretty much hates Israel, but I'm not sure why, except that their Jews.) You also may remember that our President indelicately characterized Iran as part of an "Axis of Evil" in a speech a few years ago, along with North Korea two countries that have absolutely nothing to do with each other or with bin Laden or Alqueda.

Back in the '80's the Reagan Administration had Israel sell weapons to Iran for us and then we used the proceeds to fund a band of right-wing terrorists called the "Contras" in Nicaragua. Remember that one?

Lebanon used to be a pretty westernized, country just North of Israel. Last year they held these big protests to get rid of a President who supported a political movement called Hezbolah who are supported by Syria, which is just east of Israel and sort of West of Iran and Iraq. But their new President didn't bother to disarm Hezbolah or get them away from the Israeli border.Yes, "disarm." See Hezbollah is a political party and a paramilitary movement, kind of like "Sinn Fein" is the political version of the Irish Republican Army.

Hezbolah's Secretary General is a guy named Sheikh Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah. They like to mix politics and religion. They're Shiites and Hezbolah means "the party of God." (Sounds like "Conservative-Christians.") Anyway, they don't think Israel should
exist since it was pretty much created by the U.N. after WWII and they want Lebanese prisoners released by Israel. All the latest hubbub started when they kidnapped a couple of Israeli policemen.

Meanwhile, Israel had hoped to have peace with the Palestinians (Muslims who claim to have been displaced when Israel was created.) Unfortunately the political party called "the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO)" was replaced in democratic elections this past year by a party called "Hamas."

"Hamas" means "The Islamic Resistance Movement" Hamas are Sunni, so they hate Hezbollah for being Shi'a, but of course, they hate Israel more. Many Palestinian expatriates living in Saudi Arabia and Syria send their support to Hamas, who demand that Israel pull out of Gaza and the West Bank area along the Jordan river. With the PLO, Israel had been negotiating peaceful coexistence. Two nations in one place, so to speak.

So, it should be clear that it's not so clear. What is clear is that this is a time and a region that requires delicate diplomacy. I appreciate the desire to "take the battle to the terrorists," and that waiting for politicians and diplomats to work can be frustrating because it doesn't seem as satisfyingly clear and concrete as firm military action- but it just seems to be part of a cycle of counter production.

Middle Easterners (regardless of whether they're Muslim or not or which strain of Islam) resent America for our decadence or for our meddling in everybody else's affairs (playing policeman to the world) or because of our influence over their oil. But they aren't necessarily out to take over the world and attack all Jews and Christians. They
disagree with, resent, and even hate each other too much to cooperate that much.

We still haven't caught bin Laden, five years after the first 9/11 attacks and we've strained our military and resources (not to mention American and Iraqi lives) on an unnecessary invasion of Iraq- that had nothing to do with Alqueda or 9/11.

Israel's reaction to Hezbollah may have been excessive, but this doesn't have to become WWIII. When something similar happened in the '90's, President Clinton called up the President of Syria and asked him to get Hezbollah to back off and they did.

The "War on Terror" was supposed to be taking out Alqueda, not taking on every last group that uses terrorist tactics, not an excuse to try to recreate an entire region the way we'd like it and certainly not an excuse to chip away at our own Constitutional rights and freedoms.

Maybe it's time we remembered that. Who knows, maybe if we did, it might even have a positive effect on fuel prices. It's hard to sort out, but it's important to try, because thinking is the only way to solve problems instead of making them worse.

Wednesday, August 31, 2005


"Love and Tenderness; and Davis Sandborn's Sax" oil and acrylic on board, 1992
this was a present to a dear, dear friend of ours, the best man in our wedding. He played his alto sax at our wedding, even though this is a tenor or baritone in the painting, the spirit of jazz is the same- free improvisation, cool and sophisticated, yet playful and free.
Mallory

Martin Luther King Junior, oil on canvas board, 2003
This was a wedding gift to the same friend who got the saxophone above. He and his wife have a passion for multiculturalism and equality. As a history major I've always been a huge admirer myself.

Monday, August 15, 2005


"Camelback Storm" oil on canvas, 1990.
Here's one that I did early in college. It's obviously abstract-expressionist, like Jackson Pollack and the "action painters" but for me it evokes the face of the huge boulders on Camelback Mountain in the Phoenix/Paradise Valley/Scottsdate area in Arizona after a late summer monsoon. Very dear friends bought it in Nebraska. The recently emailed me a digital photo of it.
Mallory

Wednesday, May 11, 2005


Here it is, at last, a late Mother's Day gift for my wife.
Mallory

Last stage
Mallory

Tuesday, May 10, 2005


Sunflower in black, white, blue, and red (producing some purple)
Stage three in a five part process.


"I think it annoys God if you walk by the color purple in a field
and don't notice."
- Alice Walker
From "The Color Purple"
Mallory

Sunflower in black, white and blue.
Stage two in a five step process.

"Never lose an opportunity to see anything that is beautiful.
It is God's handwriting - a wayside sacrament. Welcome
it in every fair face, every fair sky, every fair flower. "
- Ralph Waldo Emerson
Mallory

Wednesday, October 13, 2004


"One," oil on canvas, 1993. Have you hugged your Buffalo today?
Posted by Hello

"why;the paintings complete," oil on canvas, 1989
Posted by Hello

Monday, October 11, 2004


"Portrait of Picasso" mixed media, 1994 "Everything you can imagine is real". ~Picasso

Posted by Hello

Friday, October 08, 2004


"To disagree, one doesn't have to be disagreeable." ~Arizona Senator Barry Goldwater

Posted by Hello

Luther in oil on canvas. May 2004. Ephesians 2:8-10. I painted this one for our pastor's retirement. I recommend reading Luther's "The Babylonian Captivity of the Church." Especially if you're a Lutheran pastor, this book will help you understand the priesthood of all believers and put the clergy in perspective. Click here to take a look http://www.ctsfw.edu/etext/luther/babylonian/babylonian.htm


Posted by Hello